|
|
Post by SuburbanSB on Feb 12, 2015 13:17:43 GMT
It should be noted, that in the settings, having DOF turned on, will result in a better FPS by about 8 fold. (With DOF (for me) 4 FPS, Without it 18 FPS)
|
|
sss
Peasant
Posts: 1 
|
Post by sss on Feb 12, 2015 19:02:08 GMT
It's working slow for me too, especially when there is many objects in camera. I'm getting about 60 FPS in editor mode and 4-30 FPS in play mode. Changing graphics settings or screen resoution making no difference at all. My PC specs: Windows 8.1 x64 Nvidia 840m & Intel HD 4600 Intel core i7 4700MQ @ 2.4 GHz 12 GB RAM output_log.txt (132 KB) |
|
|
|
Post by tnpeel on Feb 15, 2015 2:45:41 GMT
Well seeing these posts I guess I'm not the only one having severe frame rate drops when I make a monstrosity of a machine  . With all graphics settings off in editor mode with a 300+ block machine it runs around 45fps(system is a 4690k@4.6ghz with Intel HD 4600 graphics); with speed on 100% it drops to 3fps when I start the simulation and the CPU usage is 35-50% across all cores with GPU usage only around 20%(and not even at max clock speed). With the speed set to 25% it runs at around 40fps and interestingly the CPU usage increases to around 60% on all cores with GPU at 85% usage(with max clock speed). There are definitely some weird optimization issues occurring; keep up the good work devs, looks like you have an awesome game in the making. |
|
|
|
Post by bloodeaglefilms on Feb 18, 2015 1:48:44 GMT
Hey guys.
I'm having a similar problem. I've got an i7-4790K overclocked to 4.9GHz, 16GB of DDR3-2400, and dual GTX 970s overclocked to 1350MHz each, yet I'm still dropping down to extremely low frame rates whenever my designs get relatively complex. Anytime I exceed ~50 parts, I drop from 60 to 45, anything above ~100 tanks me down to 15, and anything above ~150 delivers <5FPS. Seriously, I can cycle through a PowerPoint faster than that.
I can run Crysis 3 on max settings at 75FPS+, so needless to say I'm kind of confused and disappointed that a game as simplistic as Besiege tanks my system so severely.
I understand that it's in very early alpha, but this is still an issue. This is a fun game that has a lot of potential, but unless this issue is resolved, I don't see it succeeding with the mainstream audience once it's fully released, or at least later in the development cycle.
|
|
|
|
Post by zodium on Feb 19, 2015 9:20:35 GMT
Use time dilation. Upper left corner.
|
|
|
|
Post by bloodeaglefilms on Feb 20, 2015 4:23:42 GMT
The point is that we shouldn't have to slow down the speed of the simulation to get a decent frame rate. It's 2015, for Christ's sake.
|
|
|
|
Post by SuburbanSB on Feb 20, 2015 4:35:22 GMT
The point is that we shouldn't have to slow down the speed of the simulation to get a decent frame rate. It's 2015, for Christ's sake. Using time dilation is a work around for this issue. They understand this is a major problem, and I would assume they are currently working to resolve this. Please just sit tight and enjoy some slow motion explosions in the mean time.  |
|
. With all graphics settings off in editor mode with a 300+ block machine it runs around 45fps(system is a 4690k@4.6ghz with Intel HD 4600 graphics); with speed on 100% it drops to 3fps when I start the simulation and the CPU usage is 35-50% across all cores with GPU usage only around 20%(and not even at max clock speed). With the speed set to 25% it runs at around 40fps and interestingly the CPU usage increases to around 60% on all cores with GPU at 85% usage(with max clock speed). There are definitely some weird optimization issues occurring; keep up the good work devs, looks like you have an awesome game in the making. 
